Get Prisma (preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews And Meta-analyses) Checklist

Filling out the PRISMA checklist is a crucial step in ensuring the thorough reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This guide will provide you with detailed instructions on how to accurately complete the checklist online, facilitating clear communication of your research findings.

Follow the steps to complete the PRISMA checklist with ease.

1. Press the ‘Get Form’ button to access the PRISMA checklist and open it in your online editor.
2. Identify the report type by selecting whether your project is a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both. This information needs to be prominently stated in the title section.
3. In the structured summary section, provide detailed information on the background, objectives, data sources, eligibility criteria, study participants, interventions, study appraisal methods, results, limitations, and conclusions. Include the systematic review registration number if available.
4. Describe the rationale for your review in relation to existing knowledge in the field.
5. Clearly state the objectives of your review, specifying the questions being addressed using the PICOS framework (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, study design).
6. Indicate whether a review protocol exists, along with information about where it can be accessed. Provide any registration details including the registration number if available.
7. Specify the study characteristics and report characteristics criteria for eligibility. Justify your choices.
8. Detail all the information sources you utilized in your research, including databases and dates of coverage as well as communication with study authors.
9. Outline your study selection process, explaining how studies were screened and what criteria were used for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis.
10. Describe the methods for data collection, including how data was extracted and confirmed, such as through piloted forms.
11. List all variables for which data was sought, including any assumptions or simplifications.
12. Explain the methods used to assess the risk of bias in individual studies.
13. State the principal summary measures used to present your findings.
14. Describe how you handled data synthesis, including consistency measures for each meta-analysis.
15. Address any assessments of risk of bias affecting cumulative evidence.
16. Outline any additional analyses conducted, including methodologies for sensitivity or subgroup analyses.
17. Provide numerical data related to the studies screened, assessed, and included in your systematic review, ideally with a flow diagram.
18. Present the data characteristics extracted for each study, along with citations.
19. Discuss the risk of bias for each study and any outcome-level assessments.
20. Detail the results for each outcome considered, providing summary data and effect estimates.
21. Present results of each meta-analysis, highlighting confidence intervals and consistency measures.
22. Disclose the results of risk of bias assessments across studies.
23. Share the outcomes of any additional analyses performed.
24. Summarize the main findings and their relevance for key stakeholders.
25. Acknowledge the limitations of your study and the review.
26. Offer a general interpretation of your results, addressing future research implications.
27. Describe the funding sources and the role of funders in the systematic review.
28. Once you have completed the checklist, save your changes. You can then download, print, or share the checklist as needed, ensuring it is uploaded as a separate file with your submission.

Start filling out the PRISMA checklist online today to enhance the quality of your research documentation.