Fill Comment Paper For Free

Summary Give positive feedback first.Briefly summarize what the paper is about and what the findings are. Try to put the findings of the paper into the context of the existing literature and current knowledge. Indicate the significance of the work and if it is novel or mainly confirmatory.

Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers Rule 1: Provide an overview, then quote the full set of reviews. Rule 2: Be polite and respectful of all reviewers. Rule 3: Accept the blame. Rule 4: Make the response self-contained. Rule 5: Respond to every point raised by the reviewer.

Confidential comments to the editor may be the appropriate place to discuss sensitive information or opinions, including any potential ethical issues with the work, or information that cannot be shared with other reviewers, such as any previous interaction with the manuscript at another journal, but should in no way

Present a fact or a claim from a named (or linked) source and explain why it is relevant for the proposed research. Explain how it casts doubt or increases our confidence in a point made by the author. Your additional ideas. Could this or a closely related question be answered in a different way (specify)?

Avoid overly negative wording or personal comments, point out the main strengths of the manuscript as well as its weaknesses, and suggest specific ways to fix the problems you identify. Also, avoid making overly brief and direct comments, as these can give your report an unfriendly tone.

Peer Review: 5 Smart Tips for Providing Constructive Feedback Do Be Kind. The basic premise of peer review is to encourage further writing.Do Give Concrete Advice. Be specific with your feedback.Seek Support: Don't Assume.Be Scientific: Don't Ignore the Details.Do Meet the Deadlines.

How to write a review report Check the reviewer guidelines. Read the paper. Check data and declarations. Check reporting adherence. Develop your comments. Specify major vs minor comments. Support your statements. Add any confidential comments.

Avoid overly negative wording or personal comments, point out the main strengths of the manuscript as well as its weaknesses, and suggest specific ways to fix the problems you identify. Also, avoid making overly brief and direct comments, as these can give your report an unfriendly tone.

Confidential comments to the editor may be the appropriate place to discuss sensitive information or opinions, including any potential ethical issues with the work, or information that cannot be shared with other reviewers, such as any previous interaction with the manuscript at another journal, but should in no way

Special thanks to you for your good comments. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers' warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. If you have any question about this paper, please feel free to contact us. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.