Choose Comment License For Free

3 Main Types of Open Source Licenses MIT. This is the leanest license. It's a Do whatever you want with my stuff, just don't sue me type of license. ... Apache. Same as MIT but with more words. Great for lawyers. ... GPL. This is the heaviest license.

You should consider a personal license to be the bare minimum you offer. It won't preclude people from misusing your printables, but it may dissuade them. The next step up is a commercial license. This type of license allows the buyer to use your image in clearly delineated ways.

We created choosealicense.com, to help you understand how to license your code. A software license tells others what they can and can't do with your source code, so it's important to make an informed decision. You're under no obligation to choose a license.

In general, then, if you want your content to be shareable, you should choose a Creative Commons license, and if you want it to not be shareable, your should declare it All Rights Reserved.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC-BY-NC-SA) A creative commons license that bans commercial use and requires you to release any modified works under this license.

We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.

There are six different Creative Commons licenses: CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC BY-NC, CC BY-ND, CC BY-NC-SA, CC BY-NC-ND. The letter pairs indicate conditions for use.

In the file name field, type LICENSE or LICENSE.md (with all caps). Under the file name, click Choose a license template. On the left side of the page, under "Add a license to your project," review the available licenses, then select a license from the list. Click Review and submit.

Conclusion. The main difference between the two types of licenses (standard and CC) is that Creative Commons allows you to use certain content in your work even by partially modifying it, as long as the conditions mentioned are respected, while the standard license is the most general and restrictive in some respects.

Difference between Standard YouTube License and Creative Commons. The bottom line is that a video with a standard YouTube license cannot be reproduced, reused, or any portion of the video without the authorization of the creator. It remains the default license on all videos unless manually changed by the user.