Get Critiqueform1.fm

Filling out the Critiqueform1.fm is an essential task for evaluating research manuscripts. This guide provides a detailed overview of each section and field within the form, ensuring that users can complete it effectively and comprehensively.

Follow the steps to successfully complete the Critiqueform1.fm.

1. Click the ‘Get Form’ button to access the Critiqueform1.fm and open it in your chosen online editor.
2. In the Citation section, provide the reference for the article you are critiquing in APA style. Refer to the guidelines available for formatting this citation correctly.
3. Next, address the Problem section by detailing what the researchers aim to discover. Explain the significance of the problem and any potential benefits of the study.
4. Proceed to the Purpose section, and indicate what the researchers hope to achieve with their study. Consider if they aim to explain, predict, evaluate, explore, or describe.
5. For Constructs, list the key constructs mentioned in the article. Recall that these should be single words or phrases, and relate any relevant theoretical frameworks in the Problem section.
6. In the Hypothesis section, articulate whether the researchers state a testable hypothesis, or if the study implies relationships between variables without an explicit hypothesis.
7. Identify Variables by recognizing both exogenous and endogenous variables, detailing how they differ from constructs. The aim is to highlight specific aspects of the constructs.
8. In Operational Definitions, clarify how the variables are measured or observed, mentioning any relevant instruments such as tests or scales used.
9. Address the Subjects section by providing details about the study participants, including selection criteria and the generalizability of the data gathered.
10. In the Procedures section, review how data was collected, the use of instruments, design, and any controls for potential biases, such as experimenter expectancy.
11. Evaluate Data Analysis by detailing how researchers analyzed their data, including whether their methods allow for replication and any assumptions made during the analysis.
12. In the Results section, succinctly summarize whether outcomes align with initial expectations and consider tabulating important data as needed.
13. Discuss the Believe section, articulating what the researchers want the audience to accept from their conclusions, including acknowledgment of alternative hypotheses.
14. In the Substantiation section, critique both the data provided and the logical structure of the study regarding the claims made by the researchers.
15. Finally, assess How Strong is the Case by evaluating the adequacy of the data and logical structure provided, as well as whether the study’s conclusions are justified.
16. Once you have filled out all sections, ensure all changes are saved, and you can download, print, or share the completed form as needed.

Complete your Critiqueform1.fm online today to enhance your research evaluation skills.