Get Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants In Engineering ... - Nsf

The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge. The following elements should be considered in the review of Intellectual Merit: What is the potential for the proposed activity to advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit)?

The U.S. National Science Foundation offers hundreds of funding opportunities — including grants, cooperative agreements and fellowships — that support research and education across science and engineering.

Through the Broadening Participation in Engineering (BPE) Program, NSF seeks to strengthen the future U.S. engineering workforce by enabling and encouraging the participation of all citizens in the engineering enterprise.

From best to worst, they are: E (Excellent), V (Very Good), G (Good), F (Fair), P (Poor). (You also have the option to choose two adjacent ratings, e.g., E/V, V/G, etc.). 1. An E indicates strong advocacy for funding the proposal, and your review will explain why this proposal is a high priority for funding.

All NSF proposals are reviewed through use of the two NSB-approved merit review criteria: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts. Some solicitations may have additional review criteria.

Released late last month, the analysis shows the annual number of applications submitted to NSF has dropped by 17% over the past decade, falling from 51,562 in 2011 to 42,723 in 2020. Success rates jumped from 22% to 28% during the same period, even though the number of grants awarded increased by 8%.

Common parts of an NSF proposal Project summary. ... Project description. ... References cited. ... Documents required for senior personnel. ... Proposal budget and justification. ... Facilities, equipment and other resources. ... Postdoctoral mentoring plan (if applicable) ... Data management plan.