Get Joint Affidavit

A notarized document like an affidavit is valid for its contents up to infinity. The time, location and date on which the same was executed should be the main consideration or that the contents of the affidavit are denied by new/other evidence making the previous affidavit null and void.

An affidavit is used for the purpose of proving in court that a claim is true, and is typically used in conjunction with witness statements and other corroborating evidence.

Joint Affidavit There is no legal objection to persons joining in a single affidavit in whole or in part; but Courts or Magistrates should, in such cases, be careful that each declarant deposes separately, and that the certificate is adapted to the actual circumstances of the particular case.

2009 well there can not be a joint affidavit. in an affidavit a person is supposed to depose facts to the extent of his knowledge. and all scuh depositions shall be clear and precise. two separate individuals may be in knowledge of similar facts but their affidavits have to be separate.

A person who makes an affidavit is called a Deponent or an Affiant. The person who has authority to attest a certificate may be a Magistrate who may in turn be either a Judicial or an Executive Magistrate, a Notary Public or a Commissioner of Oaths depending upon the affidavit which needs to be attested.

In the sentence, the person writing the statement must state that he or she is stating that the information is accurate. (Example: I, Jane Doe, solemnly swear that the contents of this document are true and correct, and that I agree to abide by the terms in this affidavit.)

Affidavits are mainly used in Court proceedings. They are a written alternative to a person attending Court to give oral evidence in the witness box. Affidavits can be used to evidence, or prove, a number of things. For example, they are often used for people to tell their 'story' to the Court.

Simply: an affidavit is written evidence used to state facts, not to provide argument or conclusions. The inclusion of arguments and/or conclusions is a common fallacy of affidavit evidence, and is inadmissible.