Get Is Harmonization A Necessary Evil Form

Using Hobhouse's view as an example, it will be shown that harmonisation is not a 'necessary evil' required to create a transnational legal framework and that other methods may be more in keeping with today's free market society.

“Harmonization” (also called “unification” or “uniformity”) is the process of identifying and reconciling differences in legal systems and cultures to create instruments that standardize terms and practices of cross-border trade.

International trade law is a complex matter which involves several branches of law (commercial law, business law, company law, international payments law) and draws on multiple sources (national laws, international conventions, lex mercatoria) .

“Harmonization” (also called “unification” or “uniformity”) is the process of identifying and reconciling differences in legal systems and cultures to create instruments that standardize terms and practices of cross-border trade.

Harmonisation, also known as standardisation or approximation, refers to the determination of EU-wide legally binding standards to be met in all Member States. The creation of an internal market, which has been one of the main objectives of the EU, requires the harmonisation of some rules concerning inter-State trade.

Harmonisation seeks to 'effect an approximation or coordination of different legal provision or systems by eliminating major differences and creating minimum requirements or standards'”. Harmonisation can be seen as a step towards unification and, in a way, harmonisation aims or strives towards unification.