Get Bearing The Burden How Incarceration Weakens Inner City Communities By Joan Moore Phd University Of

Mass incarceration serves as a broader social control effort but yields many unintended consequences. The focus on punitive measures often overshadows the need for rehabilitation and support, resulting in increased recidivism rates. Furthermore, communities face higher levels of distrust and fear, disrupting social fabrics and preventing collective action. The exploration in 'Bearing The Burden: How Incarceration Weakens Inner City Communities' by Joan Moore, PhD, University Of, reveals these intricate dynamics at play.

While incarceration affects many, marginalized communities experience the most significant repercussions. Young men and individuals from low-income backgrounds often face higher rates of incarceration, leading to long-lasting effects on their families and neighborhoods. This pattern perpetuates social inequities, as families undertake the burden of loss, as highlighted in 'Bearing The Burden: How Incarceration Weakens Inner City Communities' by Joan Moore, PhD, University Of. Thus, these communities bear the weight of systemic issues that arise from these harsh realities.

Incarceration has a profound impact on communities, particularly in inner cities. It disrupts family structures, leading to emotional and financial strain on those left behind. This creates a cycle of disadvantage, as children may lack adequate support and resources. Moreover, the absence of individuals contributes to a decline in community stability and cohesion, encapsulated in the insights presented in 'Bearing The Burden: How Incarceration Weakens Inner City Communities' by Joan Moore, PhD, University Of.

Four major goals are usually attributed to the sentencing process: retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation.

People who have interacted with the justice system — a disproportionate number of whom are racial and ethnic minorities — face discrimination in the hiring process, earn lower wages, have weaker social networks, and experience less upward economic mobility than those who are never incarcerated.

With each person lost to the prison system, communities are harmed by the loss of work, a smaller tax base, and a weaker voting bloc. Economic development is curtailed and, at a broader level, the political power of minority communities is diminished.

Fragmented agencies and a lack of centralized data collection contribute to confusion, especially on the part of policymakers. In recent history, the rapid increase in incarceration started with the tough-on-crime, law-and-order, war-on-drugs policies initiated by President Nixon and established by President Reagan.

They are not allowed to vote, have little access to education, face scant job opportunities, and are ineligible for public benefits, public housing and student loans.

"Mass Incarceration" is shorthand for the following phenomenon: "After decades of stability from the 1920s to the early 1970s, the rate of imprisonment in the United States more than quadrupled during the last four decades. The U.S. penal population of 2.2 million adults is by far the largest in the world.