Copy & Paste Text Legal Arizona Product Liability Forms For Free

The statute of limitations for product liability cases varies by state but is generally from two to six years.

(1) In such case as a defect in a product causes a person's death, injury to his or her body or damage to his or her health, or damage to an item of property, the producer of the product has an obligation to compensate the injured person for the resulting damage.

Product liability is a doctrine that gives plaintiffs a cause of action if they encounter a defective consumer item. This doctrine can fall under negligence, but it is generally associated with strict liability, meaning that defendants can be held liable regardless of their intent or knowledge.

Arizona's dog bite laws establish strict liability, holding owners accountable for injuries and damages caused by their dogs. Regardless of negligence, if a dog bites someone, the owner is legally responsible for medical bills and other related expenses.

Arizona is a “Comparative Negligence” state: The defense of contributory negligence or of assumption of risk is in all cases a question of fact and shall at all times be left to the jury.

Arizona does not use the one-bite rule. Instead, it uses a strict liability law. Jurisdictions like Arizona that apply strict liability hold owners liable without the victim having to prove fault or negligence when it comes to dog bites.

In both tort and criminal law, strict liability exists when a defendant is liable for committing an action, regardless of what his/her intent or mental state was when committing the action.

The courts that deny the enforceability of a release against a strict liability do so on public policy grounds: "The doctrine of strict liability is based not only on the public policy of discouraging the marketing and distribution of defective products, but also on the reasoning that a manufacturer is in; a far better ...

Causation and Injury The claimant must demonstrate a direct causal link between the product defect and the injury sustained. This involves not just showing that the product was defective, but that this defect was the proximate cause of the injury.