Add Image Fields Legal Arizona Discovery Forms For Free

Rule 33 is amended to provide that an interrogatory is not objectionable merely because it calls for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact.

Rule 33 - Post-Conviction Relief for Defendants Who Pled Guilty or No Contest, Who Admitted a Probation Violation, or Who Had an Automatic Probation Violation.

(1) Definition. Interrogatories are written questions served by a party on another party and answered in writing and under oath. (2) Number. In connection with any petition, unless the parties agree or the court orders otherwise, a party may serve on any other party no more than 40 written interrogatories.

A party may use a uniform interrogatory when it is appropriate to the legal or factual issues of the particular action, regardless of how the action or claims are designated. A party propounding a uniform interrogatory may do so by serving a notice that identifies the uniform interrogatory by form and number.

Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party.

In actions involving multiple defendants, if default has been entered against one or more, but fewer than all of the defendants before the arbitration hearing, the arbitrator must refer all further proceedings involving the defaulted defendant(s) to the judge assigned to the action.

(f) Mandatory initial discovery responses must be made within the following deadlines: (i) a party seeking affirmative relief must serve its responses within 30 days after the filing of the first pleading made in response to its complaint, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third party complaint; and (ii) a party filing a ...

At any time before the court pronounces sentence, it may order the defendant to undergo a mental health examination or diagnostic evaluation. Unless the court orders otherwise, any report concerning such an examination or evaluation is due at the same time as the presentence report.

Rule 26.1 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the parties to a lawsuit to exchange Initial Disclosure Statements within 30 (thirty) days of the defendant filing an Answer. These disclosure statements are often referred to as “Rule 26.1 Statements” or “Rule 26.1 Disclosures” for short.