Get Private American International Banc Court Writ of Assistance and Charge of Public Banking Conspiracy

"You can't sue the United Nations in a domestic court or any court because governments have signed the treaty and some countries like the U.S. have even put it in domestic legislation," explained Larry Johnson, a former U.N. official who teaches international law at Columbia Law School.

There is no world parliament that can impose laws on non consenting sovereigns. The UN is not tasked with acting as one. At the same time, UN can give birth to legally binding norms in international law. ... Additionally, UN may act as a forum for negotiation of various binding treaties.

Once a country has signed a treaty and ratified it (incorporated into domestic law) they are now bound by the International Court of Justice. ... The court was established in 1946 as an organ of the UN, the court deals with disputes between states; individuals and groups' cannot use the court to bring states to justice.

Sources of international law include treaties, international customs, general principles of law as recognized by civilized nations, the decisions of national and lower courts, and scholarly writings.

In one represented by the old world order all states agree that war is legal, a tool to right wrongs. In that world, conquest is permissible, aggression is not a crime, neutrals must stay impartial (thus economic sanctions against aggressors are illegal) and agreements may be coerced by the threat of violence.

While Member State representatives enjoy modified diplomatic privileges and immunities, United Nations officials, i.e. permanently employed staff members, enjoy functional immunity which is defined in article V, section 18 (a), as immunity from legal process in respect of words spoken or written and all acts ...

The Supreme Court now has a chance to provide balance where there currently is none. It is not a question of whether diplomatic immunity should be upended but rather whether the culture of impunity for non-diplomats such as U.N. officials should end.

The court agreed with the World Bank's contention that it has immunity under the International Organizations Immunities Act. ... The World Bank has been declared the equivalent of a sovereign state, and in this context is placed above any law as if it possesses diplomatic immunity.

Suggested clip Does Diplomatic Immunity Really Make It So You Can Get Away with ...YouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clip Does Diplomatic Immunity Really Make It So You Can Get Away with ...

If a diplomat is actively trying to kill someone, diplomatic immunity doesn't stop that person or the police from intervening with appropriate force, up to and including deadly force if needed. Diplomatic immunity only applies once the immediate issue is dealt with. Second, consuls do not have diplomatic immunity.

The short answer is that you can certainly try to sue another country either in your country or in that country. There are, generally, no rules preventing you from bringing suit just because the defendant is a country. Most of the time, however, that country doesn't have to let you sue it.

When you cannot sue the county, you may have other options. Suing the county may be too broad. However, you can sue a custodian, a teacher, or various school officials as individuals if they engaged in specific negligence that caused your injury. Government employees can be sued in a personal capacity.

Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government -- unless the government says you can. Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment.

Foreign sovereign immunity in state and federal courts The FSIA provides the exclusive basis and means to bring a lawsuit against a foreign sovereign in the United States. In international law, the prohibition against suing a foreign government is known as state immunity.

It is possible to bring a claim against a banker under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC ), a government entity created in 1993 to safeguard people's financial investments. It is possible to sue bank directors for negligence, and the FDIC itself sometimes files malpractice claims against bank directors.