Quantum Meruit

In order be able to prevail on a claim of unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must prove each of the following five elements: (1) an enrichment, (2) an impoverishment, (3) a connection between the enrichment and the impoverishment, (4) the absence of justification for the enrichment and impoverishment, and (5) the absence

Unjustified enrichment is where one person receives a benefit or value from another at the expense of the latter without any legal cause for such receipt or retention of the value or benefit by the former.

Courts have crafted four basic elements that the plaintiff must prove before she may recover under the doctrine of quantum meruit: (1) that valuable services were rendered; (2) that the services were rendered to the defendant; (3) that the services were accepted, used, and enjoyed by the defendant; and (4) that the

Definition. Latin for "as much as he has deserved." An equitable remedy that provides restitution for unjust enrichment. Damages awarded in an amount considered reasonable to compensate a person who has provided services in a quasi-contractual relationship.

To recover on a claim of unjust enrichment, the plaintiff must show that the defendant was unjustly enriched at the plaintiff's expense.Recovery on a theory of unjust enrichment typically occurs where there was no contract between the parties, or a contract turns out to be invalid.

Unlike a breach of contract claim, unjust enrichment claims don't require a direct contract between the claimant and the defendant. This offers an opportunity to recover from parties beyond merely the nonpaying party kind of like a mechanics lien.

An enrichment of or benefit to the defendant; A corresponding deprivation of the plaintiff; and. The absence of a juristic reason for the enrichment.

There was an enrichment or benefit received by the defendant; A loss was suffered by the plaintiff related to the enrichment, and; There was no juristic reason for the enrichment.