This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.
Assistance Of Counsel Clause In Salt Lake
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Salt Lake
Control #:
US-000277
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Demonstrating ineffective assistance of counsel under the Supreme Court's Strickland test can be complicated. Having to meet both prongs of the test, counsel's substandard performance and prejudice, are daunting tasks.
Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to a situation in which a criminal defendant's legal representation fails to meet the minimum standards of competence and diligence expected from attorneys.
Datavs, 71 M.J. 420 (to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, an accused must demonstrate both (1) that his counsel's performance was deficient, and (2) that this deficiency resulted in prejudice).
File a motion for a new trial: Your attorney will file a motion for a new trial, which will argue that your trial lawyer provided ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion will include evidence to support this claim. Attend a hearing: The court will hold a hearing to consider your motion for a new trial.
When arguing ineffective assistance, a defendant may allege their counsel failed to: Investigate a case, including any potential defenses. File necessary motions such as a motion to suppress evidence or a motion in limine. Obtain expert witness assistance relevant to a defendant's defense.
Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to a situation in which a criminal defendant's legal representation fails to meet the minimum standards of competence and diligence expected from attorneys.
Failing to meet a court-imposed deadline is most likely not to qualify as ineffective assistance of counsel because it is a procedural issue that may not directly impact the defense's effectiveness as per Strickland v. Washington and Padilla v. Kentucky.
Essentially, if a defendant's income is at or below 150 percent of the federal poverty levels established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, he or she will be eligible for a public defender.